Home   »» Sitemap Search:  

Home | Medicines And Remedies


Why Would Someone Choose a Non-12-step Recovery Approach?

By: Tom Horvath

If you were a woman with breast cancer, you’d probably want to know that there were several treatment options you had: radical mastectomy, lumpectomy, radiation, chemotherapy, holistic services, nutritional approaches, some combination of these options, or doing nothing, with new options emerging continually. You might be inclined to let your physician decide what to do. However, most individuals would want to make a decision of this magnitude for themselves. So, you would want to know how successful each approach is, what it costs, the recovery period involved, the side effects, and the likely complications. You would want to talk to individuals who had used each approach. You would search the internet. You would get input from multiple sources. Your final decision would probably be made in consultation with your physician, and loves ones. It would be based on many factors, especially your own deepest beliefs and values.

Seeking addiction recovery in the US is a very different experience from seeking cancer treatment. Most people don’t know that there are a range of recovery options. Most professionals don’t volunteer information about these options (presumably because they don’t know this information). Most individuals considering getting outside assistance with recovery are told that there is only one effective approach, the 12-step approach.

Despite being given the misinformation that “AA is the only way” some people intuitively know there must be other options. How do they know? Based on prior life experience, apparently they know to ask some relevant questions.

1) Is AA effective? As it turns out, the effectiveness of AA is unknown. A little searching on the internet will reveal this fact. For instance, the National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs (nrepp.samhsa.gov) doesn’t list AA. Of the seven experimentally tested and replicated alcohol treatments for adults, only one includes AA attendance.

The National Registry is a service of the US federal government. It states on the home page: “Welcome to the National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP), a service of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). NREPP is a searchable database of interventions for the prevention and treatment of mental and substance use disorders. SAMHSA has developed this resource to help people, agencies, and organizations implement programs and practices in their communities.”

Another significant source of information on evidence-based addiction treatment is here:

http://www.behaviortherapy.com/whatworks.htm

This site summarizes an evaluation of every randomized, controlled, experimental trial of alcohol treatment in the scientific literature available at the time, nearly 400 studies. Treatments are listed in order of the strength of the evidence supporting them. Of the 48 treatments listed, only the first 18 have sufficient evidence to be considered evidence-based. On this list Twelve-step facilitation and Alcoholics Anonymous are numbers 37 and 38.

2) Is attending groups necessary? Looking at either of the above two lists of treatments, most are provided to individuals, couples or families, not groups.

3) Is belief in a higher power necessary? Looking at the same lists, only one, Twelve-step facilitation therapy, involves belief in a higher power.

Why would someone choose a non-12-step recovery approach? Based on just these three questions, we can see that someone who wanted to use an evidence-based approach, didn’t want to attend groups, or didn’t want to involve belief in a higher power in his/her recovery, might easily choose a non-12-step recovery approach.

Is AA worth considering? Yes! Should it be the only option considered? No! If the approach to informing patients about their breast cancer treatment options is any guide, we may soon have addiction providers informing their clients about the full range of recovery options. It is unethical for cancer specialists to fail to provide information about treatment options when those options exist. It may soon be unethical for addiction treatment professionals to fail to provide accurate information about addiction recovery options.

Article Source: http://www.kravities.com

A. Tom Horvath, Ph.D., ABPP, is a board certified clinical psychologist and president of Practical Recovery alcohol addiction treatment, an addiction treatment facility in La Jolla (San Diego), CA, focusing on collaborative care and self-empowerment.

Please Rate this Article

 

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Medicines and Remedies Articles Via RSS!

  • 4228
    Gore said he would be one of five judges helping Mr. Branson choose a winner. An initial $5 million would be awarded to the most promising design. The full award would come once the design proved viable and worked for at least 10 years ...
  • from dr marc f kern
    dr. kern's approach has grown out of his own recovery from personal addictions. having found 12-step programs like aa ineffective in his ownsituation, his pursuit of rational, logical solutions led him to in-depth psychological research ...
  • neurotransmitters and addiction: a close link
    did you know that a commonly cited statistic for alcohol treatment programs is less than 20 percent recovery after one year? in other words, out of every five people who enter an addiction program, only one will actually stay sober. ...
  • i was an alcoholic ...
    20-21) according to aa, no amount of logic or persuasion or desire can bring a real alcoholic to lasting sobriety. there also exist a number of purely secular non-12 step programs which promote abstinence as a recovery goal, ...



Article Directory   SiteMap

Powered by Article Dashboard